The Buildings That Could "Fly"​ or Digital Construction

-
Photo Credit: xdubai.com

I have not been blogging for quite some time now and LinkedIn seems to be the right platform to get started again after having a 3-year pause on my personal BIM blog at BIMSpot.blogspot.com. 

I would like to discuss the collective mindset that we need to change in order to be able to build better and more efficiently. Nowadays, implementation and utilization of technology in construction grow hourly. However, the way we use to build, or at least the building mindset remains unchanged.

Are we not very serious about the accuracy and consistency of the information that we produce in order to build? Are we reluctant to follow the exact (information) drawings and specifications, etc, when we are on site, in the field to execute the work? What happens as a result; we say something on paper, but we build something else on the ground.

Now, what if the buildings that we build were meant to fly, just like the aeroplanes that carry millions of people every day? Would we still be so reluctant to change the ways we build or the ways we produce buildable, coordinated, verified information to build? Would we still care about changing that HVAC duct position not to clash with the steel structure?
And what is even more ironic, would we make sure that the resulting digital coordination is actually taken seriously by the team members who execute work in the field? Because, if we don't, and we try to fly that building tomorrow, it might leak air, leak chilled water and pose a thread to poeples lives.

In the aircraft and automotive industry, digital prototyping and production,  based on digital prototyping are far ahead of those in the construction industry. Yet it seems that the technology is mature enough nowadays to accommodate digital prototyping and high precision building setting-out in construction. This is just one of the areas where major construction waste is hidden, that results in massive re-work for all the supply chain entities, as well as every individual professional involved. That in turn, creates a toxic and unhealthy environment to work, to engineer and to create. Creativity is diminished by stress...

Let's change. The technology is here. Let's build the buildings of tomorrow that could even fly...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Concrete Encased Duct Banks for external MEP/Utilities

-
Image
Most probably those of you who use Revit's MEP systems for modelling civil utilities came across the problem of finding the best method to create concrete encasement for duct banks running from one chamber to another. You have most probably tried the lined based family as well, which suits good if there are no slopes along the run. But when you need the encasement to follow your ducts? In my explorations to make a reliable concrete encasement family I found Revit's conceptual massing tools very useful to create an adaptive line based family. I used Metric Generic Model Adaptive as a family template. First you need to create two points along one of the ref planes like in the illustration below then connect them using spline through points option.    Then select the line and tick the Is Reference box in the instance properties: After that select the point and click Make Adaptive button on Modify tab. Next you need to create a rig which will host the
Read more

Family template for manholes used in Stormwater & Sewer utilitiy networks

-
Image
Let's start with one of the most required families that we need when modelling a civil or infrastructure network (external MEP). It is assumed that you (readers of this article) are already familiar with the basics of Revit family creation. Manholes . Manholes, basically drive the gravity networks like storm-water and sewer, and if you will spend some time to have that perfect family it can drive all the rest of the utility network and make everything more coordinated and emission-less. Complete Manhole Family with conditional formulas already applied.  A general rule about the manholes is that they are driven by two key Variables . • Invert Level (IL) and  • Cover Level (CL) commonly referred aslo as GL (Ground Level) And as a general rule in Civil Infrastructure models or drawings your reference level is always absolute 0.00.That gives us an idea to build our family main parameters in relations to Ref.Level which is found in all family templates. It means that if y
Read more

Titleblocks: key plan automatic zone selection & hatching

-
Image
As you finish your model and step onto the next stage of producing coordinated workshop drawings from the model you start facing challenges in coordinated annotation and document control issues which can also be tricked & parametrized to allow for more of what I call Building Information Annotation (C) . The issue I want to discuss and share with you is common in Revit documenting environment. So as we all may have noticed we have a Filled Region Tool which help as annotate/hatch with patters almost in every possible view in Revit. Except one: in sheets/titleblocks. Yes you cannot hatch or create a filled region on your titleblock. You can however do it withing the family of a titleblcock. Our team came across this issue when we were trying to mark the corresponding Zones in our Key Plan which we had on a particular project titleblocks. So the first thing we did when we realized that you can't hatch a region (or Create Filled Region) we just marked a zone by manually d
Read more